Frontend That
Loads Fast
And Converts.
Astro SSR for marketing sites. React for dashboards and interactive tools. Vite for SPA and micro-frontend architecture. Lighthouse 95+ by default.
< BUILD_MY_FRONTEND />Three Frontend Modes
< ASTRO SSR />
Marketing sites, landing pages, blog + KB systems. HTML ships to the browser. React islands only where needed. Sub-second LCP. Lighthouse 95–100.
< REACT APPS />
Client portals, admin dashboards, complex forms, calculator tools. React 18 with server components where applicable. Tailwind + shadcn/ui.
< VITE MICRO-APPS />
Embeddable widgets, calculator iframes, and SPAs that need fast HMR and tree-shaken bundles under 50kb.
What I Build for Clients
Marketing Sites (Astro)
Agency sites, SaaS landing pages, and portfolio sites. SSR with CMS-driven content. Conversion-optimized layout. Lighthouse 100.
Dashboards (React)
Analytics dashboards, client portals, and internal tools. Real-time data via WebSocket. Recharts for visualization.
Calculator Tools (React/Vite)
ROAS, CAC, LTV, ROI calculators. Embeddable on any site. API-backed for logged calculations. Lead capture built in.
Headless CMS Frontends
Astro or React consuming WordPress REST API, Sanity, or a custom PostgreSQL CMS. Content editable without code changes.
Design System Implementation
Tailwind-based component libraries. Consistent tokens, dark mode, and component documentation.
Performance Optimization
Core Web Vitals audit and fix. LCP, CLS, INP. Image optimization, font loading, JS reduction. Lighthouse 40 → 95+.
Why Astro Over Next.js for Marketing
Next.js is a great framework for app development. For marketing sites it ships too much JavaScript. A page that should be 40kb of HTML ends up being 300kb of JS because of the Next.js runtime.
Astro solves this with the island architecture: HTML by default, JavaScript only where the component needs it. A Astro marketing site with a React contact form will ship zero JavaScript to pages that do not need the form.
The result: LCP under 1 second, Lighthouse scores in the 95–100 range, and a Core Web Vitals pass without heroic optimization effort. For a client site where every second of load time costs conversions, this matters.
When I use React instead: dashboards, interactive calculators, real-time data apps, anything with complex client state. React 18 + server components for the best of both worlds.
What Is Broken in Most Agency Sites
After auditing dozens of marketing sites the problems follow a pattern. Performance is always the first casualty.
- ⚠ 400kb+ JavaScript bundle on a page with no interactivity
- ⚠ No image optimization — 4MB hero images blocking LCP
- ⚠ Google Fonts blocking render — 600ms font download before first paint
- ⚠ No OG tags, no schema markup, no canonical URLs
Scope Your Frontend Project
Tell me what you're building. I'll recommend the right stack and timeline.
Frontend That Performs and Converts.
From Lighthouse 40 to 98. From 4-second loads to under 1 second.
Get a Frontend Audit